Enacted legislation:
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
(Pub. L. 108-187, S. 877)
The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act
requires unsolicited commercial e-mail messages to be
labeled (though not by a standard method) and to include
opt-out
instructions and the sender's physical address. It prohibits the
use of deceptive subject lines and false headers in such messages.
The FTC is authorized
(but not required) to establish a "do-not-email" registry. State laws that require labels on
unsolicited commercial e-mail or prohibit such messages entirely are pre-empted,
although provisions merely addressing falsity and deception would remain in place.
The CAN-SPAM Act took effect on January 1, 2004.
The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 was introduced by Senators
Conrad R. Burns (R-MT) and
Ron Wyden (D-OR) in April 2003,
with minor changes from the previous year's version,
S. 630 (2002).
Two other bills (S. 1231 and
S. 1293) were subsequently merged into it.
The final version was approved by the Senate in November 2003 and
by the House of Representatives in December 2003, and was signed into
law by President Bush on December 16, 2003.
Unenacted bills:
Anti-Phishing Act of 2004 (S. 2636)
The Anti-Phishing Act of 2004 was introduced on July 9, 2004,
by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT);
it would prohibit, among other activities, sending e-mail that
directs recipients to a website that falsely purports to belong
to a legitimate online business and solicits recipients to
provide personal information.
Anti-Spam Act of 2003 (H.R. 2515)
The Anti-Spam Act of 2003 was introduced on June 18, 2003, by
Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM);
co-sponsors include Rep. Rick Boucher
(D-VA) and Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA).
The bill would require all
commercial
e-mail messages to be identified as such (but not with a standard
label, except
for sexually explicit messages), and to include the sender's physical street
address and an opt-out mechanism; messages relating to a specific transaction and
consented to by the recipient would be exempt from those requirements.
The bill would prohibit commercial e-mail messages with false or misleading
message headers
or misleading subject lines, and it would be illegal to send commercial e-mail
messages to addresses generated by an automated dictionary attack.
State laws that restrict the sending of commercial e-mail, regulate opt-out
procedures, or require subject-line labels would be pre-empted; laws that
merely regulate falsification of message headers would remain in effect.
Ban on Deceptive Unsolicited Bulk Electronic Mail Act of 2003 (S. 1052)
The Ban on Deceptive Unsolicited Bulk Electronic Mail Act of 2003 was introduced by
Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) in May 2003.
It would prohibit the inclusion of false information in
message headers
in unsolicited
bulk
commercial
e-mail. It also would require senders of unsolicited bulk commercial
e-mail to include opt-out instructions and honor opt-out requests, and would prohibit
them from harvesting e-mail addresses of potential recipients from web pages and
other sources. Violations of the law could be prosecuted under RICO.
Computer Owners' Bill of Rights (S. 563)
The Computer Owners' Bill of Rights, introduced by Sen. Mark Dayton (D-MN) in March 2003, would require the
Federal Trade Commission
to establish a "do-not-email" registry of addresses of persons and entities who do
not wish to receive unsolicited
commercial e-mail messages. The FTC would be
empowered to impose civil penalties upon those who send unsolicited commercial
e-mail to addresses listed on the registry.
Criminal Spam Act of 2003 (S. 1293)
The Criminal Spam Act of 2003 was introduced on June 19, 2003, by
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT); among the
co-sponsors are several senators who have sponsored other bills listed here.
The bill would prohibit unauthorized or deceptive use of a third party's
computer for relaying bulk
commercial
e-mail messages. It also prohibits the use of false
header
information in bulk commercial messages, and regulates
the use of multiple e-mail accounts or domain names for purposes of sending
such messages. The law would apply only to quantities of more than 100
messages within 24 hours, or 1000 within 30 days, or 10,000 within one year.
REDUCE Spam Act of 2003 (H.R. 1933)
The Restrict and Eliminate the Delivery of Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail
or Spam Act of 2003 was introduced by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) in May 2003. Under the REDUCE Spam Act,
unsolicited bulk commercial e-mail messages would be required to include a valid
reply address
and opt-out
instructions, and a label ("ADV:" or "ADV:ADLT", or other recognized standard identification).
These requirements would apply to messages sent in the same or similar form to
1,000 or more e-mail addresses within a two-day period. In addition, false or
misleading headers
and deceptive subject lines would be prohibited in all unsolicited commercial e-mail
messages, whether or not sent in bulk.
Reduction in Distribution of Spam Act of 2003 (H.R. 2214)
The Reduction in Distribution of Spam Act of 2003 was introduced in
May 2003 by Rep. Richard Burr, R-NC;
cosponsors include Energy and Commerce Committee chairman
Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-LA, and
Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-WI. The bill
would require all
commercial
e-mail messages to be identified as such (but not with a standard
label, except
for unsolicited sexually explicit messages), and to include the sender's
physical address and an opt-out mechanism. It would prohibit the use of false or misleading
headers
in commercial messages. State laws that prohibit unsolicited commercial
e-mail, regulate opt-out procedures, or require subject-line labels would be
pre-empted; laws that merely regulate falsification of message headers would
remain in effect.
Stop Pornography and Abusive Marketing Act (S. 1231)
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY)
introduced the Stop Pornography and Abusive Marketing Act,
or "SPAM Act," in June 2003. The bill would establish a national
"no-spam"
registry, and make it unlawful to send
unsolicited commercial messages to addresses on that list. The
list would be administered by the FTC, using fees paid by marketers for access to the list.
The FTC would be empowered to prohibit explicit commercial messages to minors
even if they were not on the list. All unsolicited commercial messages would
be required to use a label ("ADV:") at the beginning of the
subject line, except those sent in compliance with an FTC-approved
self-regulatory program. It would be illegal to send any commercial e-mail
in violation of an Internet service provider's
policies,
or with a false or misleading subject line or
message header,
or to harvested
addresses; all commercial messages would be required to include the
sender's physical address.
Wireless Telephone Spam Protection Act (H.R. 122)
H.R. 122, introduced by Rep Rush D. Holt
(D-NJ) in January 2003, would prohibit the use of wireless messaging
systems to send unsolicited advertisements.