Articles

David E. Sorkin, Spam Legislation in the United States, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 3 (2003).
David E. Sorkin, Technical and Legal Approaches to Unsolicited Electronic Mail, 35 U.S.F. L. Rev. 325 (2001).
David E. Sorkin, Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 45 Buffalo L. Rev. 1001 (1997).
David E. Sorkin, Revocation of an Internet Domain Name for Violations of "Netiquette": Contractual and Constitutional Implications, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 587 (1997).
Justin Leung, Privacy Breach Leaves Identities of Student Loan Recipients Exposed (2013).
Dominique-Chantale Alepin, Note, "Opting-Out": A Technical, Legal and Practical Look at he CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 28 Colum. J.L. & Arts 41 (2004).
Elizabeth A. Alongi, Note, Has the U.S. Canned Spam?, 46 Ariz. L. Rev. 263 (2004).
Kenneth C. Amaditz, Canning "Spam" in Virginia: Model Legislation to Control Junk E-mail, 4 Va. J.L. & Tech. 4 (1999).
Michelle Armond, Cyberlaw: State Internet Regulation and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 17 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 379 (2002).
Stephanie Austria, Note, Forgery in Cyberspace: The Spoof Could be on You!, 5 Pitt. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y 2 (2004).
Ian Ayres & Matthew Funk, Marketing Privacy, 20 Yale J. on Reg. 77 (2003).
Susan M. Ballantine, Note, Computer Network Trespasses: Solving New Problems with Old Solutions, 57 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 209 (2000).
Richard C. Balough, The Do-Not-Call Registry Model Is Not the Answer to Spam, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 79 (2003).
David T. Bartels, Note, Canning Spam: California Bans Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 30 McGeorge L. Rev. 420 (1999).
W. Parker Baxter, Recent Development, Has Spam Been Canned? Consumers, Marketers, and the Making of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 8 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 163 (2004).
J. Brian Beckham, Casenote, Intel v. Hamidi: Spam as a Trespass to Chattels -- Deconstruction of a Private Right of Action in California, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 205 (2003).
Yochai Benkler, Net Regulation: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, 71 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1203 (2000).
Steven E. Bennett, Note, Canning Spam: CompuServe, Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc., 32 U. Rich. L. Rev. 545 (1998).
Arminda B. Bepko, Note, A State-by-State Comparison of Spam Laws, 13 Media L. & Pol'y 20 (2004).
Jordan M. Blanke, Canned Spam: New State and Federal Legislation Attempts to Put a Lid on It, 7 Comp. L. Rev. & Tech. J. 305 (2004).
John E. Brockhoeft, Evaluating The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 4 Loy. Law & Tech. Ann. 1 (2004).
Dan L. Burk, The Trouble with Trespass, 4 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 27 (2000).
Michael W. Carroll, Garbage In: Emerging Media and Regulation of Unsolicited Commercial Solicitations, 11 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 233 (1996).
Dannielle Cisneros, Issue Brief, Do Not Advertise: The Current Fight Against Unsolicited Advertisements, 2003 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 10.
Shelley Cobos, Note, A Two-Tiered Registry System to Regulate Spam, 2003 UCLA J. L. Tech. 5.
Evan Cramer, Issue Brief, The Future of Wireless Spam, 2002 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 21.
Ben Dahl, A Further Darkside to Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail? An Assessment of Potential Employer Liability for Spam E-Mail, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 179 (2003).
Joseph D'Ambrosio, Should "Junk" E-Mail Be Legally Protected?, 17 Computer & High Tech. L.J. 231 (2001).
Patty M. DeGaetano, Note, Intel Corp. v. Hamidi: Private Property, Keep Out -- The Unworkable Definition of Injury for a Trespass to Chattels Claim in Cyberspace, 40 Cal. W. L. Rev. 355 (2004).
David Dickinson, Note, An Architecture for Spam Regulation, 57 Fed. Comm. L.J. 129 (2004).
Michael B. Edwards, Recent Development, A Call to Arms: Marching Orders for the North Carolina Anti-Spam Statute, 4 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 93 (2002).
Christopher D. Fasano, Comment, Getting Rid of Spam: Addressing Spam in Courts and in Congress, 2000 Syracuse L. & Tech. J. 3. [66K PDF]
George H. Fibbe, Screen-Scraping and Harmful Cybertrespass after Intel, 55 Mercer L. Rev. 1011 (2004).
Michael A. Fisher, Note, The Right to Spam? Regulating Electronic Junk Mail, 23 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts 363 (2000).
Credence E. Fogo, The Postman Always Rings 4,000 Times: New Approaches to Curb Spam, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 915 (2000).
R. Jonas Geissler, Whether "Anti-Spam" Laws Violate the First Amendment, 2001 J. Online L. art. 8.
Brian G. Gilpin, Attorney Advertising & Solicitation on the Internet: Complying with Ethics Regulations and Netiquette, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 697 (1995).
Eric Goldman, Where's the Beef? Dissecting Spam's Purported Harms, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 13 (2003).
Jack L. Goldsmith & Alan O. Sykes, The Internet and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 110 Yale L.J. 785 (2001).
David A. Gottardo, Comment, Commercialism and the Downfall of Internet Self Governance: An Application of Antitrust Law, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 125 (1997).
Scot M. Graydon, Much Ado About Spam: Unsolicited Advertising, the Internet, and You, 32 St. Mary's L.J. 77 (2000).
Seth Grossman, Note, Keeping Unwanted Donkeys and Elephants Out of Your Inbox: The Case for Regulating Political Spam, 19 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1533 (2004).
Anne E. Hawley, Comment, Taking Spam Out of Your Cyberspace Diet: Common Law Applied to Bulk Unsolicited Advertising via Electronic Mail, 66 UMKC L. Rev. 381 (1997).
William E. Hornsby, Jr., Spamming for Legal Services: A Constitutional Right within a Regulatory Quagmire, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 97 (2003).
Diane E. Horvath & John S. Jung, 1999 Technology Legislation in Virginia, 33 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1037 (1999).
Christopher Hurld, Current Development, Untangling the Wicked Web: The Marketing of Legal Services on the Internet and the Model Rules, 17 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 827 (2004).
David R. Johnson, Susan P. Crawford & John G. Palfrey, Jr., The Accountable Internet: Peer Production of Internet Governance, 9 Va. J.L. & Tech. 9 (2004).
Carol Jones, News, E-Mail Solicitation: Will Opening a "Spam-Free" Mailbox Ever Be a Reality?, 15 Loyola Consumer L. Rev. 69 (2002).
Steven Kam, Note, Intel Corp. v. Hamidi: Trespass to Chattels and a Doctrine of Cyber-Nuisance, 19 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 427 (2004).
Jennifer M. Kappel, Comment, Government Intervention on the Internet: Should the Federal Trade Commission Regulate Unsolicited E-Mail Advertising?, 51 Admin. L. Rev. 1011 (1999).
Sabra-Anne Kelin, Note, State Regulation of Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 16 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 435 (2001).
Jeremiah Kelman, Note, E-Nuisance: Unsolicited Bulk E-Mail at the Boundaries of Common Law Property Rights, 78 S. Cal. L. Rev. 363 (2004).
Joseph P. Kendrick, Recent Development, "Subject: ADV:" Anti-Spam Laws Force Emerging Internet Business Advertisers to Wear the Scarlet "S," 7 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 563 (2003).
Dennis W.K. Khong, An Economic Analysis of Spam Law, 1 Erasmus L. & Econ. Rev. 23 (2004).
Shari A. Kolnicki, The Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Its Burden on Small Business: An Evaluation of the Law and Its Ramifications on Telecommunication Advances, 28 Cap. U. L. Rev. 223 (1999).
Jeffrey L. Kosiba, Comment, Legal Relief from Spam-Induced Internet Indigestion, 25 Dayton L. Rev. 187 (1999).
Ari Lanin, Note, Who Controls the Internet? States' Rights and the Reawakening of the Dormant Commerce Clause, 73 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1423 (2000).
Dianne Plunkett Latham, Electronic Commerce in the 21st Century: Spam Remedies, 27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1649 (2001).
Cathryn Le, Note, How Have Internet Service Providers Beat Spammers?, 5 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 9 (1998).
Thomas K. Ledbetter, Comment, Stopping Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail: Why the CAN-SPAM Act Is Not the Solution to Stop Spam, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 107 (2004).
Richard C. Lee, Note, Cyber Promotions, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., 13 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 417 (1998).
Mark A. Lemley, The Law and Economics of Internet Norms, 73 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1257 (1998).
Lawrence Lessig, The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 501 (1999).
Lawrence Lessig & Paul Resnick, Zoning Speech on the Internet: A Legal and Technical Model, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 395 (1999).
John Magee, The Law Regulating Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail: An International Perspective, 19 Computer & High Tech. L.J. 333 (2003).
Christopher Scott Maravilla, The Feasibility of a Law to Regulate Pornographic, Unsolicited, Commercial E-Mail, 4 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 117 (2002).
Joshua A. Marcus, Note, Commercial Speech on the Internet: Spam and the First Amendment, 16 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 245 (1998).
Erin Elizabeth Marks, Comment, Spammers Clog In-boxes Everywhere: Will the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Halt the Invasion?, 54 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 943 (2004).
Elizabeth Phillips Marsh, Purveyors of Hate on the Internet: Are We Ready for Hate Spam?, 17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 379 (2000)
Daniel L. Mayer, Note, Attacking A Windmill: Why the CAN SPAM Act Is a Futile Waste of Time and Money, 31 J. Legis. 177 (2004).
Michael D. McConathy, Comment, Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. F.C.C. and Moser v. F.C.C.: How Much Should the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Restrict Your Phone, Fax and Computer, 26 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 153 (1996).
R. Clifton Merrell, Note, Trespass to Chattels in the Age of the Internet, 80 Wash. U. L.Q. 675 (2002).
Karin Mika, Information v. Commercialization: The Internet and Unsolicited Electronic Mail, 4 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 6 (1998).
Gary Miller, How to Can Spam: Legislating Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 2 Vand. J. Ent. L. & Prac. 127 (2000). [129K PDF]
Steven Miller, Comment, Washington's "Spam Killing" Statute: Does It Slaughter Privacy in the Process?, 74 Wash. L. Rev. 453 (1999).
Anne P. Mitchell, Vendor Liability for Advertising in Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 137 (2003).
Sameh I. Mobarek, Note, The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Was Congress Actually Trying to Solve the Problem or Add to it?, 16 Loy. Consumer L. Rev. 247 (2004).
Gary S. Moorefield, Note, SPAM -- It's Not Just for Breakfast Anymore: Federal Legislation and the Fight to Free the Internet From Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 5 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 10 (1999). [161K PDF]
Adam Mossoff, Spam -- Oy, What a Nuisance!, 19 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 625 (2004).
Paul K. Ohm, Comment, On Regulating the Internet: Usenet, A Case Study, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1941 (1999).
Max Ochoa, Note, Recent State Laws Regulating Unsolicited Electronic Mail, 16 Computer & High Tech. L.J. 459 (2000).
Bridget M. O'Neill, Comment, Wireless Spam This Way Comes: An Analysis of the Spread of Wireless Spam and the Present and Proposed Measures Taken To Stop It, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 229 (2003).
Don Passenger & Jeff Kirkey, Un-Canned Spam: Getting It Back in the Tin, 82:3 Mich. B.J. 36 (Mar. 2003).
David G. Post, Internet: Of Black Holes and Decentralized Law-Making in Cyberspace, 2 Vand. J. Ent. L. & Prac. 70 (2000).
Ethan Preston, Finding Fences in Cyberspace: Privacy and Open Access on the Internet, 6.1 J. Tech. L. & Pol'y 3 (2001).
Matthew B. Prince & Patrick A. Shea, After CAN-SPAM, How States Can Stay Relevant in the Fight Against Unwanted Messages: How a Children's Protection Registry Can Be Effective, and Is Not Preempted, under the New Federal Anti-Spam Law, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 29 (2003).
Matthew T. Rollins, Examination of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct Pertaining to the Marketing of Legal Services in Cyberspace, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 113 (2003).
Laura Quilter, The Continuing Expansion of Cyberspace Trespass to Chattels, 17 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 421 (2002).
Monique Redford, Comment, The Indecency of Unsolicited Sexually Explicit Email: A Comment on the Protection of Free Speech v. The Protection of Children, 26 Seattle U. L. Rev. 125 (2002).
Cindy M. Rice, Comment, The TCPA: A Justification for the Prohibition of Spam in 2002?, 3 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 375 (2002).
Ashley L. Rogers, Note, Is There Judicial Recourse to Attack Spammers?, 6 Vand. J. Ent. L. & Prac. 338 (2004).
John D. Saba, Jr., Comment, Internet Property Rights: E-Trespass, 33 St. Mary's L.J. 367 (2002).
John D. Saba Jr., 2003 Legislative Update, Anti-Spam Legislation: Eproclamation: No More Spam in Texas, 66 Tex. B. J. 660 (2003).
Jan H. Samoriski, Unsolicited Commercial E-mail, the Internet and the First Amendment: Another Free Speech Showdown in Cyberspace?, 43 J. Broadcasting & Electronic Media (2000).
Douglas K. Schnell, Note, Don't Just Hit Send: Unsolicited E-mail and the Attorney-Client Relationship, 17 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 533 (2003).
Charles D. Siegal, Rule Formation in Non-Hierarchical Systems, 16 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 173 (1998).
Derek D. Simmons, Comment, No Seconds on Spam: A Legislative Prescription to Harness Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail, 3 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 389 (1999).
Marc Simon, Note, The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003: Is Congressional Regulation of Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail Constitutional?, 4 J. High Tech. L. 85 (2004).
Eric J. Sinrod & Barak D. Jolish, Controlling Chaos: The Emerging Law of Privacy and Speech in Cyberspace, 1999 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1.
Eric J. Sinrod, Jeffrey W. Reyna & Barak D. Jolish, The New Wave of Speech and Privacy Developments in Cyberspace, 21 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 583 (1999).
Reagan Smith, Note, Eliminating the Spam from Your Internet Diet: The Possible Effects of the Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2001 on Junk E-Mail, 35 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 411 (2004).
Jeff Sovern, Protecting Privacy with Deceptive Trade Practices Legislation, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 1305 (2001).
Robert Louis B. Stevenson, Issue Brief, Plugging the "Phishing" Hole: Legislation versus Technology, 2005 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 6.
Jeffrey D. Sullivan & Michael B. de Leeuw, Spam after CAN-SPAM: How Inconsistent Thinking Has Made a Hash out of Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail Policy, 20 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 887 (2004).
Mark Sweet, Issue Brief, Political E-Mail: Protected Speech or Unwelcome Spam?, 2003 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 1.
Mozelle W. Thompson, The Challenges of Law in Cyberspace -- Fostering the Growth and Safety of E-Commerce, 6 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 1 (2000).
Heather L. Thuet, Recent Legislative Development, Internet Law: Unsolicited Commercial and Sexually Explicit Email Act: A Ban on "Spam," 2003 Utah L. Rev. 815.
Vasilios Toliopoulos, Legislative Update, Regulating Your Internet Diet: The Can Spam Act of 1999, 10 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L. 175 (1999)
Nancy Toross, Comment, Double-Click on This: Keeping Pace with On-Line Market Manipulation, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1399 (1999).
Jacquelyn Trussell, News, Is the CAN-SPAM Act the Answer to the Growing Problem of Spam?, 16 Loy. Consumer L. Rev. 175 (2004).
Jo Vandermause, Comment, You've Got Indecent E-Mail!, 1999 Wis. L. Rev. 1259.
Richard Warner, Spam and Beyond: Freedom, Efficiency, and the Regulation of E-Mail Advertising, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 141 (2003).
Calvin Whang, Comment, An Analysis of California's Common and Statutory Law Dealing with Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail: An Argument for Revision, 37 San Diego L. Rev. 1201 (2000).
Mitchel L. Winick, Debra Thomas Graves & Christy Crase, Attorney Advertising on the Internet: From Arizona to Texas -- Regulating Speech on the Cyber-Frontier, 27 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1487 (1996).
Timothy Wu, Application-Centered Internet Analysis, 85 Va. L. Rev. 1163 (1999).
Grant C. Yang, Issue Brief, Canning Spam: Consumer Protection or a Lid on Free Speech?, 2004 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 16.
Adam Zitter, Note, Good Laws for Junk Fax? Government Regulation of Unsolicited Solicitations, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2767 (2004).
Development, The Long Arm of Cyber-reach, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1610 (1999).
Development, Communities Virtual and Real: Social and Political Dynamics of Law in Cyberspace, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1586 (1999).
Note, The Impermeable Life: Unsolicited Communications in the Marketplace of Ideas, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1314 (2005).
Recent Case, Constitutional Law -- Dormant Commerce Clause -- Washington Supreme Court Upholds State Anti-Spamming Law -- Washington v. Heckel, 24 P.3d 404 (Wash. 2001), 115 Harv. L. Rev. 931 (2002).
Recent Development, Trespass to Chattels and the Internet: Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, 17 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 283 (2003).
Recent Developments, Technology and Related Law, 4 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 411 (2000).

Note: Articles for which hyperlinks do not appear above are generally available on Lexis, Westlaw, or SSRN. Student-written articles are typically designated by "Note," "Recent Development," or a similar term.

(0 Comments)

Post a comment